After my team completed the PICOT question, we did have to revise it slightly. We needed to be more specific on the idea of quality of life in our question. We were challenged with how to change the question to be more specific but also still make sense for what we wanted to do. We solved this challenge by talking through it together, each of us came up with different ways to say the question/statement and pulled ideas from each group member to make a more thorough PICOT question. Through this challenge, we were able to succeed on having a better, well-formed question. We did not have any challenges with team collaboration, each team member participated actively. If we had problems, we would have sat down and spoken through the problem to achieve success.
Recent Comments
- jamiebullock on Post Help Reflection
- jamiebullock on Pre-Hospital Elder Life Program Reflection
- jamiebullock on Medication Reconciliation Reflection
- Denise Blais on How I Made a Difference
- Susan Goran on NL Reflection: Modules 3 & 4
Categories
- Career Development
- Change
- Collaboration
- EBP II Posts
- ENG-110
- EPB 1 Posts
- Ethics
- Goal-setting
- Integrated Experience
- Integrating Experience III
- leadership
- Licensure
- NSG 315- Adult Health II
- NSG 332- Evidence-Based Practice
- NSG 444 Posts
- NSG-202 Posts
- NSG-328 Mental Health
- Nurse's role
- Pharmacology
- PICOT
- Professionalism
- Reflection
- Research
- Role of Nurse
- Self-Care
- Uncategorized
Leave a Reply